Page 53

Proefschrift binnenwerk Manon Ernst_DEF.indd

C H A N G E   I N   T O T A L   B O D Y  W A T E R   A S   A   P R E D I C T I V E   T O O L   F O R   G R O W T H   H O R M O N E   T R E A T M E N T   R E S P O N S E     Discussion   The  present  study  evaluates  the  use  of  changes  in  body  composition  after  6  weeks   for   the   prediction   of   the   effect   of   rhGH   treatment   on   growth   after   one   year.   In   an   earlier   study   of   Hoos   et   al.13 a   change   in   body   composition   proved   to   be   valuable   for   the   distinction   between   good   and   poor   responders   to   rhGH   treatment   in   28   children  with  GHD.  In  this  study  the  same  cut  off  value17  for  growth  response  was   taken  and  the  connection  with  the  change  in  body  composition  was  evaluated  in  a   larger  cohort  of  GHD  children.  At  the  same  time  this  was  done  in  children  born  SGA   without  spontaneous  catch  up  growth.       Conform  the  study  of  Hoos  et  al.13 we  used  the  Deuterium  dilution  method  to  esti-­‐ mate   the   TBW.   Because   in   this   technique   the   Deuterium   as   well   as   the   collected   urine   could   be   transported   by   mail,   it   was   easy   possible   to   conduct   a   nationwide   study.   The   TBW   was   used   instead   of   the   FFM   because   the   hydration   level   of   the   FFM,   which   in   adults   is   assumed   to   be   73%,   is   age-­‐dependent   and   not   reliable   enough   in   children.   To   interpret   the   TBW   in   patients   who   differ   in   height,   the   re-­‐ sults   are   corrected   for   height   as   TBW/height2,   in   accordance   with   the   Body   Mass   Index   (BMI).   The   TBW   was   not   corrected   for   weight,   because   height   was   the   dis-­‐ criminating  factor  for  good  and  poor  responders  and  accepted  as  a  more  constant   factor  over  a  period  of  6  weeks.       The   change   in   TBW   correctly   predicted   the   growth   response   in   75%   of   the   GHD   patients   (Figure   1,   quadrant   B   and   D).   To   use   this   method   as   a   predictor   of   the   growth  response,  the  positive  and  negative  predictive  values  are  most  important.  If   the  child  has  a  change  in  TBW  of  >  0.7  l/m2,  the  chance  to  have  a  good  growth  reac-­‐ tion  is  73%  (positive  predictive  value).  The  negative  predictive  value  75%  suggests   that   if   a   child   shows   a   low   increase   in   TBW/height2,   the   expectation   is   that   this   child  will  not  grow  more  than  0.7  SDS  in  one  year.  At  the  same  time  8%  will  have  a   false  negative  test  result.    Whether  the  change  in  body  composition  of  <  0.7  l/m2  is  a   reason  to  stop  treatment  with  rhGH  is  under  discussion,  because  the  cut  off  value  of   0.7  SDS  is  based  on  the  mean  response  value  in  literature,  but  is  in  fact  arbitrary.       The  reason  for  the  different  cut  off  value  in  both  studies  is  probably  based  on  the   difference   in   the   amount   of   children   included.   In   the   study   of   Hoos,   only   28   GHD   children  are  involved.  In  our  study  88  GHD  children  are  involved.     In  SGA  children  the  relation  of  a  change  in  body  composition  with  the  growth  reac-­‐ tion  is  less  clearly  demonstrated,  although  they  have  a  comparable  growth  reaction   compared  to  the  GHD  children  (mean  growth  response  of  0.832  SDS  versus  0.874   SDS).   In   SGA   children   a   change   in   TBW   of   >   0.7   l/m2   is   strongly   predictive   for   a   growth   response   of   more   than   0.7   SDS   in   one   year   (Figure   2   quadrant   B,   positive     51  


Proefschrift binnenwerk Manon Ernst_DEF.indd
To see the actual publication please follow the link above