Page 47

Proefschrift binnenwerk Manon Ernst_DEF.indd

C H A N G E   I N   T O T A L   B O D Y  W A T E R   A S   A   P R E D I C T I V E   T O O L   F O R   G R O W T H   H O R M O N E   T R E A T M E N T   R E S P O N S E     Introduction   In  pediatric  endocrinology  short  stature  is  a  frequently  seen  problem.  Children  with   short  stature  due  to  growth  hormone  deficiency  (GHD)  or  due  to  be  born  small  for   gestational   age   (SGA)   are   indicated   for   growth   hormone   treatment.   However,   not   all   children   seem   to   benefit   from   this   treatment   and   it   is   unclear   how   to   predict   whether  a  child  will  have  an  adequate  or  inadequate  response  to  growth  hormone   therapy.       Short  stature  as  a  result  of  GHD  has  an  incidence  of  1:3500  and  is  the  original  indi-­‐ cation   for   treatment   with   recombinant   human   growth   hormone   (rhGH)   in   child-­‐ hood.   According   to   the   Dutch   rules   at   least   two   stimulation   tests   (for   example   clonidine  and  arginine  test)  with  an  increase  of  growth  hormone  below  20  mU/l  are   needed  to  confirm  the  diagnosis  of  GHD  and  to  obtain  an  indication  for  rhGH  treat-­‐ ment1.   Despite   the   results   of   the   stimulation   tests,   the   individual   responses   to   treatment   with   rhGH   vary   widely.   The   second   well-­‐defined   indication   for   rhGH   treatment2  is  restricted  to  those  infants  with  birth  weight  and/or  length  of  at  least   2  SD  below  the  mean  for  gestational  age,  and  without  catch-­‐up  growth  before  the   age   of   4   years   (SGA)1.   They   do   not   need   a   stimulation   test   and   a   normal   value   of   insuline-­‐like  growth  factor  (IGF1)  is  no  contraindication  for  treatment.  Most  of  the   SGA  children  have  a  spontaneous  catch-­‐up  growth  in  the  first  2  years  of  life,  but  1   out  of  10  subjects  remains  of  short  stature  during  childhood  and  seems  to  benefit   from   treatment   with   rhGH.   The   mechanisms   that   are   involved   in   this   catch-­‐up   growth  in  SGA  children  are  unknown2  and  none  of  the  endocrine  parameters  seem   to  have  any  predictive  value.     Already  at  an  early  age  both  the  GHD  and  the  SGA  children  show  abnormalities  in   body  composition3.  While  GHD  children  show  an  increased  total  body  fat,  SGA  chil-­‐ dren  show  a  reduced  body  fat  percentage4,5.  Treatment  with  rhGH  in  adults  causes   a  shift  in  body  composition  towards  an  increase  in  fat-­‐free  mass  (FFM)6.  In  children   with   GHD   the   same   effect   was   found   in   several   studies   during   treatment   with   rhGH3,7-­‐11.  It  is  also  proven  that  a  shift  in  body  composition  is  already  present  after   6  weeks  of  treatment8-­‐12.  In  the  study  of  Hoos  et  al.13  it  is  shown  that  the  increase  in   FFM,  measured  with  the  Deuterium  dilution  method  after  6  weeks  of  treatment,  is  a   valuable   tool   for   distinction   between   good   and   poor   responders   on   growth   meas-­‐ ured   after   one   year   of   treatment   in   children   diagnosed   with   GHD.   A   comparable   effect  in  SGA  children  is  not  described  in  literature  yet.     Objectives   Based  on  the  above  mentioned  results  a  Dutch  nationwide  study  was  performed  to   investigate  whether  the  findings  of  the  study  of  Hoos  et  al.13  could  be  confirmed  in  a   larger   cohort   of   children   indicated   for   rhGH   treatment.   A   second   objective   of   this     45  


Proefschrift binnenwerk Manon Ernst_DEF.indd
To see the actual publication please follow the link above