Chapter 5 imagery paradigms in older healthy volunteers: A fTCD study.J Neurosci Methods206: 143-150, 2012. 24. Schroeter ML, Cutini S, Wahl MM, Scheid R, and Yves von Cramon D. Neurovascular coupling is impaired in cerebral microangiopathy-An event-related Stroop study.Neuroimage2006. 25. Silvestrini M, Troisi E, Matteis M, Razzano C, and Caltagirone C. Correlations of flow velocity changes during mental activity and recov- ery from aphasia in ischemic stroke.Neurology50: 191-195, 1998. 26. Sitzer M, Knorr U, and Seitz RJ. Cerebral hemodynamics during sen- sorimotor activation in humans.Journal of Applied Physiology77: 2804- 2811, 1994. 27. Smith EE, Vijayappa M, Lima F, Delgado P, Wendell L, Rosand J, and Greenberg SM. Impaired visual evoked flow velocity response in cere- bral amyloid angiopathy.Neurology71: 1424-1430, 2008. 28. Spronck B, Martens EG, Gommer ED, and van de Vosse FN. A lumped parameter model of cerebral blood flow control combining cerebral autoregulation and neurovascular coupling. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol303: H1143-1153, 2012. 29. Tiecks FP, Lam AM, Aaslid R, and Newell DW. Comparison of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation measurements.Stroke26: 1014- 1019, 1995. 30. van Beek AH, Olde Rikkert MG, Pasman JW, Hopman MT, and Claas- sen JA. Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation in the Old Using a Repeated Sit-Stand Maneuver.Ultrasound Med Biol36: 192-201, 2010. 31. Zaletel M, Strucl M, Pretnar-Oblak J, and Zvan B. Age-related changes in the relationship between visual evoked potentials and visually evoked cerebral blood flow velocity response.Funct Neurol20: 115-120, 2005. 32. Zaletel M, Strucl M, Rodi Z, and Zvan B. The relationship between visually evoked cerebral blood flow velocity responses and visual- evoked potentials.Neuroimage22: 1784-1789, 2004. 98
proefschrift gommer inhoud met kaft.indd
To see the actual publication please follow the link above