Introduction and historical background 45 417 Meyers, P. M. et al. Reporting standards for endovascular repair of saccular intracranial cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31, E12-24, (2010). 418 Cloft, H. J., Kaufmann, T. & Kallmes, D. F. Observer agreement in the assessment of endovascular aneurysm therapy and aneurysm recurrence. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28, 497-500, (2007). 419 Serafin, Z., Strzesniewski, P., Lasek, W. & Beuth, W. Follow-up after embolization of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A prospective comparison of two-dimensional digital subtraction angiography, three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography, and time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography. Neuroradiology, (2012). 420 Schaafsma, J. D. et al. Intracranial aneurysms treated with coil placement: test characteristics of follow-up MR angiography--multicenter study. Radiology 256, 209-218, (2010). 421 Pierot, L., Portefaix, C., Boulin, A. & Gauvrit, J. Y. Follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: comparison of 3D time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3T in a large, prospective series. Eur Radiol, (2012). 422 Kaufmann, T. J. et al. A prospective trial of 3T and 1.5T time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31, 912-918, (2010). 423 Shankar, J. J., Lum, C., Parikh, N. & dos Santos, M. Long-term prospective follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular coiling using contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31, 1211- 1215, (2010). 424 Ferre, J. C. et al. Time-of-flight MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the imaging follow-up of 51 intracranial aneurysms treated with coils. Eur J Radiol 72, 365-369, (2009). 425 Bakker, N. A. et al. Feasibility of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) follow-up as the primary imaging modality after coiling of intracranial aneurysms. Acta Radiol 51, 226-232, (2010). 426 Lavoie, P. et al. Residual flow after cerebral aneurysm coil occlusion: diagnostic accuracy of MR angiography. Stroke 43, 740-746, (2012). 427 Daugherty, W. P. et al. Observer agreement regarding the necessity of retreatment of previously coiled recurrent cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32, 566-569, (2011). 428 Agid, R., Willinsky, R. A., Lee, S. K., Terbrugge, K. G. & Farb, R. I. Characterization of aneurysm remnants after endovascular treatment: contrast-enhanced MR angiography versus catheter digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29, 1570-1574, (2008). 429 Anzalone, N. et al. Follow-up of coiled cerebral aneurysms at 3T: comparison of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29, 1530-1536, (2008). 430 Anzalone, N. et al. Follow-up of coiled cerebral aneurysms: comparison of three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography at 3 tesla with three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 1.5 Tesla. Invest Radiol 43, 559-567, (2008). 431 Wallace, R. C., Karis, J. P., Partovi, S. & Fiorella, D. Noninvasive imaging of treated cerebral aneurysms, part I: MR angiographic follow-up of coiled aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28, 1001-1008, (2007). 432 Wikstrom, J., Ronne-Engstrom, E., Gal, G., Enblad, P. & Tovi, M. Three-dimensional time-of-flight (3D TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and contrast-enhanced MRA of intracranial aneurysms treated with platinum coils. Acta Radiol 49, 190-196, (2008). 433 Nakiri, G. S. et al. A comparison between magnetic resonance angiography at 3 Teslas (time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced) and flat-panel digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of embolized brain aneurysms. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 66, 641-648, (2011). 434 Sprengers, M. E. et al. Evaluation of the occlusion status of coiled intracranial aneurysms with MR angiography at 3T: is contrast enhancement necessary? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30, 1665-1671, (2009). 435 Ramgren, B. et al. Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: comparison of 3D inflow MRA at 3T and 1.5T and contrast-enhanced MRA at 3T with DSA. Neuroradiology 50, 947-954, (2008). 436 Agid, R., Schaaf, M. & Farb, R. CE-MRA for Follow-up of Aneurysms Post Stent-Assisted Coiling. Interv Neuroradiol 18, 275-283, (2012). 437 Lovblad, K. O. et al. Intracranial aneurysm stenting: follow-up with MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 24, 418-422, (2006). 438 Takayama, K. et al. Usefulness of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for follow-up of coil embolization with the enterprise stent for cerebral aneurysms. J Comput Assist Tomogr 35, 568-572, (2011). 439 Lubicz, B., Neugroschl, C., Collignon, L., Francois, O. & Baleriaux, D. Is digital substraction angiography still needed for the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by embolisation with detachable coils? Neuroradiology 50, 841-848, (2008). 440 Majoie, C. B. et al. MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26, 1349-1356, (2005).
proefschrit Van Zwam inhoud met kaft en stellingen.indd
To see the actual publication please follow the link above